New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct the facelettaglibrary to web-facelettaglibrary_4_0.xsd #1497
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for jakartaee ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
For me this shows:
Similar to above - missing in jakartaee-schemas, JakartaEE 9 schema including Jakarta EE 10 - for https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee/web-facesconfig_4_0.xsd and https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee/web-facesconfig_3_0.xsd accordingly. |
I fixed the ee10 ref to ee9 in the 3_0 facelettaglibrary, but I don't understand the point of the jakartaee-schemas when it has only ever contained a fraction of the schemas, and cannot be the true source since the specification projects are what generate the schemas. I'll bring this up on tomorrows platform call. |
The commit ccab423 brings some changes, but that's not what I meant:
I see. So what is the source of file committed here then? I can't locate it in the tree https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/tree/4.0.1-RELEASE. It's not a part of https://jakarta.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/staging/jakarta/faces/jakarta.faces-api/4.0.1 artifact. But I might be wrong assuming it's Faces responsinble for that schema. When the spec generates the schema - what happens next, where does it go? I also wonder what's the point of jakartaee-schemas if it's not to be used for that. |
@starksm64 What about This XSD version is used for Jakarta EE 9 and Jakarta EE 10. However, it was updated to use the Jakarta EE 10 common types. Would it be safe from the point of view of Jakarta EE 9 descriptor validations? They will be using the Jakarta EE 10 common types instead of the Jakarta EE 9. |
😕 |
No description provided.