Incrementation bug

[cdgls]

When making a change in a unprojected view (ie not the highest projection), the displayed picture is not incrementing to the result of the change you made, so it looks as though nothing is happening. (Ie a new slice is created, but the picture doesn't display the newly created slice.)

[jamievicary]

Yeah, I agree this is really annoying, thanks for listing it as a bug.
On 2 May 2016 4:04 p.m., "cdgls" notifications@github.com wrote:

When making a change in a unprojected view (ie not the highest
projection), the displayed picture is not incrementing to the result of the
change you made, so it looks as though nothing is happening. (Ie a new
slice is created, but the picture doesn't display the newly created slice.)

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#40

[cdgls]

Just to be clear, it is incrementing the first slice number, but not the second, and that's the bug --- it should increment the second as well.

[jamievicary]

I think that whatever slice or projection you're in, after making a move
with the mouse, you should be shown the slice in which the 'ordinary
effect' of that move is visible - do you agree?
On 2 May 2016 4:11 p.m., "cdgls" notifications@github.com wrote:

Just to be clear, it is incrementing the first slice number, but not the
second, and that's the bug --- it should increment the second as well.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#40 (comment)

[cdgls]

I think I agree, though I'm not sure what distinction is being made by 'ordinary effect' --- do you mean the effect that would be visible at that slice/projection currently on view?

[jamievicary]

I mean the effect you would see if the diagram you were looking at was
completely unsliced (ie if you clicked restrict before doing the move.)
On 2 May 2016 4:34 p.m., "cdgls" notifications@github.com wrote:

I think I agree, though I'm not sure what distinction is being made by
'ordinary effect' --- do you mean the effect that would be visible at that
slice/projection currently on view?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#40 (comment)

[cdgls]

Then yes, I agree.