Django 2.0 support #298
Merged
Django 2.0 support #298
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Using this in production @ https://devel.tech/ |
tony
force-pushed
the
django-2.0
branch
7 times, most recently
from
69fc69d
to
f40d300
Compare
Passes in python version via travis python: param
|
I'm going to go ahead and merge this into master. I'm using this in production ATM. I just had an issue on django-robots where someone overlapped with a PR for 2.0 compatibility. 😄 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #297 (comment)
This covers a few areas
_chainin django 2.0 query chaining instead of_cloneuse_for_related_fields = Truein favor of the new MRO for managersFixes #297