Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add comparisons and concept checks #29

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jbcoe
Copy link
Owner

@jbcoe jbcoe commented Sep 22, 2023

Fixes #20
Progresses #21

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.22% 🎉

Comparison is base (f2767b1) 94.98% compared to head (b8fb77d) 95.21%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #29      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.98%   95.21%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         459      481      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits          436      458      +22     
  Misses         23       23              
Files Changed Coverage Δ
indirect.h 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
indirect_test.cc 93.75% <100.00%> (+0.64%) ⬆️
polymorphic.h 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jbcoe jbcoe requested a review from Twon September 22, 2023 22:48
These changes ended up coupled as <=> needs concept checks.

For CI, use AppleClang 14 and Xcode 14 to get concept support
@jbcoe jbcoe force-pushed the dev-jbcoe-concepts-and-comparisons branch from 5c01f9e to bc79e81 Compare September 22, 2023 22:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@Twon Twon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, but we should add the completeness tests and update the table and expected behavour for the paper

indirect.h Show resolved Hide resolved
jbcoe added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2023
Added discussion of design and compromises.

Note: Missing comparison and hash for indirect as their inclusion needs a PR (#29) to be merged.
@jbcoe jbcoe merged commit c20885a into main Sep 24, 2023
12 checks passed
@jbcoe jbcoe deleted the dev-jbcoe-concepts-and-comparisons branch September 24, 2023 00:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for comparison operators to indirect
2 participants