New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JBTM-2853 JBTM-2858 Disable failing tests TODO revert #1142
Conversation
Started testing this pull request with RTS profile: http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=RTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/320/ |
Started testing this pull request with XTS profile: http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=XTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/320/ |
RTS profile tests passed - Job complete http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=RTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/320/ |
XTS profile tests passed - Job complete http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=XTS,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/320/ |
Hi Ondra - I will merge this temporarily once you can review and add a git revert into your 1138 PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tom, will be those exclusion enough? I think the follow-up tests from rts and xts modules fail too. E.g. outbound bridge will most probably fail too. And for rts there is inbound bridge test which I think will not pass as well.
If you want I can check which are those failing tests. Or the easiest would be exclude all testcases from those modules for now.
well, the PR passes with just those exclusions so I think it should be fine? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright, I missed that fact. Sorry ;)
But it's interesting as the set of failing tests is different from what I saw last week. I need to check it out when I will be back at JBTM-2858., Thanks!
I wonder if there have been fixes upstream in WFLY? Thanks for the review! |
MAIN profile tests failed (https://ci-master-jenkins-csb-narayana.cloud.paas.psi.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=MAIN,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=swarm/428/): Narayana rebase on master failed. Please rebase it manually |
BLACKTIE profile tests failed on Linux (https://ci-master-jenkins-csb-narayana.cloud.paas.psi.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=BLACKTIE,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=swarm/428/): Narayana rebase on master failed. Please rebase it manually |
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2853
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2858
!MAIN !QA_JTA !QA_JTS_JDKORB !BLACKTIE !PERF NO_WIN