JBTM-3140 Update LRA to 1.0-20190429.061212-359

[xstefank]

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-3140

NestedLRA annotation was removed from the specification.

!QA_JTA !QA_JTS_JDKORB !QA_JTS_OPENJDKORB !QA_JTS_JACORB !BLACKTIE !XTS !PERF NO_WIN !AS_TESTS !TOMCAT !JACOCO !mysql !postgres !db2 !oracle !RTS

[jbosstm-bot]

Started testing this pull request with LRA profile: http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=LRA,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/591/

[jbosstm-bot]

Started testing this pull request with MAIN profile: http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=MAIN,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/591/

[jbosstm-bot]

LRA profile tests passed - Job complete http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=LRA,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/591/

[jbosstm-bot]

MAIN profile tests passed - Job complete http://narayanaci1.eng.hst.ams2.redhat.com/job/btny-pulls-narayana/PROFILE=MAIN,jdk=jdk8.latest,label=linux/591/

[mmusgrov]

I am already working on the fix for this. You have missed out the context propagation for the parent context and that is why I have delayed my PR.

This was what I mentioned at the end of this morning's LRA hangout.

[xstefank]

I needed this for my work on the spec. @mmusgrov what does that mean? Should I add parent header handling or close this and let you rework it?

[mmusgrov]

No, I mean I am working on the Narayana fix for this.

[mmusgrov]

Give me until later on this afternoon and I will raise my PR

[xstefank]

so if I understood you correctly I should close this one. I can always reopen it if I misunderstood.

[mmusgrov]

Yes please