Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Manual query and generate Looping Animations #19

Open
VimWei opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Manual query and generate Looping Animations #19

VimWei opened this issue Sep 16, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@VimWei
Copy link

VimWei commented Sep 16, 2019

Could you please add or recreat a feature just like another anki-addon “Word Query”:

Manual query from a configurable field,and generate a “Looping Animation”.

So, I can embed the “Looping Animation” to any deck's any cards, but not all cards.

@jcklie
Copy link
Owner

jcklie commented Sep 17, 2019

Thank you for the request! How do you imagine would the card in the editor then look like? I would just imagine that you have a field configured, if it is filled then I insert the looping animation to a HTML tag you added in the template.

@VimWei
Copy link
Author

VimWei commented Sep 17, 2019

I imagine the configurations Look like:

  1. which field query from?
  2. which field would stroke insert to?
  3. stroke style (if we have multi styles):
    (1)“Loop animation”
    (2)“stroke fanning visualization”

But i don’t understand what’s the role of “a HTML tag you added in the template”. What’s the relationship between the HTML tag and the configuration no.2?

@jcklie
Copy link
Owner

jcklie commented Sep 28, 2019

I added a prototype. You can see it here. Is this what you envisioned?

jcklie added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2019
- Seperate hook and quiz into different files
jcklie added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2019
- Basic implementation works
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants