Conversation
LGTM |
Before merging let's double check there are no version conflicts int he labs projects and/or karaf/cli. |
I've just noticed that the fix version in JIRA is marked for 2.0.1, but I don't think we should upgrade libraries in bugfix versions. IMO this shouldn't be backported to 2.0.x. |
agreed changed to |
tested successfully jclouds-labs-openstack seems to have building problems independent of that PR |
I'll have a look edit: seems to work with or without the PR.. |
thanks @zack-shoylev my fork was not in sync, sorry about that |
@nacx, both @zack-shoylev and myself tested this change and it looks fine. Good to merge? |
thanks @nacx -- do you think it is just for master or also 2.0.x? |
merged at master |
Just for master. We don't want to introduce dependency conflicts to people upgrading to 2.0.1. |
k thx |
Looks like this has broken jclouds-karaf:
|
I'm sure jclouds/jclouds-karaf#92 fixes it but I
will extract it from that PR and submit asap a patch
…On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Ignasi Barrera ***@***.***> wrote:
Looks like this has broken jclouds-karaf:
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf/org.
apache.jclouds.karaf$itests/2088/
features:install jclouds-rackspace-cloudfiles-us
java.lang.Exception: Could not start bundle mvn:org.apache.jclouds/jclouds-core/2.1.0-SNAPSHOT in feature(s) jclouds-2.1.0-SNAPSHOT: Unresolved constraint in bundle jclouds-core [83]: Unable to resolve 83.0: missing requirement [83.0] osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=javax.ws.rs)(version>=2.0.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1057 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEN2-nuX0NCYRYTNwkC-VDgZC6rhV8D_ks5rcuR1gaJpZM4L2Mja>
.
|
/cc @nacx and @neykov