Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to update the old OSARA FX Bypassed/active functionality? #1016

Closed
Lo-lo78 opened this issue Mar 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1018
Closed

Is it possible to update the old OSARA FX Bypassed/active functionality? #1016

Lo-lo78 opened this issue Mar 10, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1018

Comments

@Lo-lo78
Copy link

Lo-lo78 commented Mar 10, 2024

Hello with the new versions of Reaper we now have feedback of the status of the plugin in the FX chain.
Now if you bypass a plugin it will be repeated twice.
I believe one from OSARA and the second from Reaper.
In this case I would give precedence to Reaper.
When it is activated I think it says OSARA.
In this case we can decide if it is good or not good.
when it is active it is reported by OSARA and not by Reaper. We might as well leave it.
In my opinion, a choice needs to be made here.
There is also a second problem.
When you open the menus there is a bit of confusion:
Add container 3 di 39. bypassed
And this is even stranger:
Run selected FX in parallel with previous FX, activated3 di 39. active
In my opinion it needs to be fixed up a bit. 🙂

@ScottChesworth
Copy link
Collaborator

Yep, I'm already planning to remove the OSARA hack that reports bypass. Just waiting a while to make sure we don't require a very recent release as our minimum supported version.

@jcsteh
Copy link
Owner

jcsteh commented Mar 10, 2024

Strictly speaking, we could sniff the version of REAPER and disable that hack only for recent versions which make this accessible properly. That would allow us to avoid bumping the minimum requirement. It probably wouldn't be that hard to implement, but it does raise the question again of how long we intend to support old versions. Still, I don't like the idea of having a subpar experience for some as yet undetermined period of time. :)

@ScottChesworth
Copy link
Collaborator

That would be neat.

jcsteh added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2024
…e FX chain list in REAPER 7.06 and later, since REAPER now makes this accessible properly.

Fixes #1016.
jcsteh added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2024
…e FX chain list in REAPER 7.06 and later, since REAPER now makes this accessible properly. (issue #1016, PR #1018)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants