Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update windows.md #5683

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 1, 2017
Merged

Update windows.md #5683

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 1, 2017

Conversation

Nursen
Copy link
Contributor

@Nursen Nursen commented Dec 23, 2016

Added an update to installation instructions, as a cert authority change in Ruby causes problems with the prior recommended version of Ruby.

Added an update to installation instructions, as a cert authority change in Ruby causes problems with the prior recommended version of Ruby.
@DirtyF DirtyF added documentation windows Related to the Windows platform labels Dec 23, 2016
Copy link
Member

@ashmaroli ashmaroli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requesting some changes..

@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ For a more conventional way of installing Jekyll you can follow this [complete g

[windows-installjekyll3]: https://labs.sverrirs.com/jekyll/

\[Update 12/23/2016\]: Updates in the infrastructure of Ruby may cause SLL errors when attemptying to use gem install on a version of ruby older than 2.6. (The ruby package installed via the Chocolatey tool is version 2.3) If you have installed an older version, you can update ruby using the directions [here.][ssl-certificate-update]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggesting a couple of edits :

  • I don't think including a date is necessary. The information is not fresh-off-the-press and it is understandable by only mentioning the version-number.
  • its SSL instead of SLL;
  • gem install should be within backticks.: gem install
  • its not "...ruby older than 2.6" but "...RubyGems Package older than 2.6."
  • again, "The RubyGems package installed via the Chocolatey.."
  • ...update RubyGems package using the directions [here]..."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the review, appreciate the feedback!

revising terminology to avoid ambiguity and moving in relation to alternative install instructions.
fixing typo
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ A quick way to install Jekyll is to follow the [installation instructions by Dav
2. Install Ruby via Chocolatey: `choco install ruby -y`
3. Reopen a command prompt and install Jekyll: `gem install jekyll`

Updates in the infrastructure of Ruby may cause SLL errors when attempting to use `gem install` on a version of the RubyGems package older than 2.6. (The RubyGems package installed via the Chocolatey tool is version 2.3) If you have installed an older version, you can update the RubyGems package using the directions [here.][ssl-certificate-update]
Updates in the infrastructure of Ruby may cause SSL errors when attempting to use `gem install` on a version of the RubyGems package older than 2.6. (The RubyGems package installed via the Chocolatey tool is version 2.3) If you have installed an older version, you can update the RubyGems package using the directions [here.][ssl-certificate-update]
Copy link
Member

@ashmaroli ashmaroli Dec 24, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does the following sound? I think its better.. 😉

- when attempting to use `gem install` on a version of the RubyGems package older than 2.6.
+ when attempting to use `gem install` with versions of the RubyGems package older than 2.6.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed, it flows better.

@ashmaroli
Copy link
Member

/cc @jekyll/documentation

@DirtyF DirtyF requested a review from a user December 24, 2016 10:43
@Nursen Nursen closed this Jan 1, 2017
@Nursen Nursen reopened this Jan 1, 2017
@Nursen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nursen commented Jan 1, 2017

What's the appropriate action to take here? Should I be leaving this thread open until someone with write access decides whether to merge it?

@Nursen Nursen closed this Jan 1, 2017
@Nursen Nursen reopened this Jan 1, 2017
@DirtyF
Copy link
Member

DirtyF commented Jan 1, 2017

@jekyllbot: merge +docs

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit 0d62e7f into jekyll:master Jan 1, 2017
jekyllbot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2017
@Nursen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nursen commented Jan 1, 2017

Thanks!

@Nursen Nursen deleted the patch-1 branch January 1, 2017 15:52
@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 11, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
frozen-due-to-age windows Related to the Windows platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants