Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Release Jekyll v3.9.2 #9012

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2022
Merged

Release Jekyll v3.9.2 #9012

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2022

Conversation

parkr
Copy link
Member

@parkr parkr commented Mar 26, 2022

Headline feature is Ruby 3.x support for the Jekyll 3.9.x series!

@parkr parkr mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2022
Merged
@parkr parkr requested a review from a team March 26, 2022 18:49
ashmaroli
ashmaroli approved these changes Mar 27, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@ashmaroli ashmaroli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if we should highlight 3.x compatibility when the user will still have to manually add webrick to their Gemfile.
Also, the release post has a future timestamp from now. Not an issue if the PR is merged at or after that time.

@parkr parkr merged commit 42150e9 into 3.9-stable Mar 27, 2022
@parkr parkr deleted the 3-9-2 branch March 27, 2022 20:24
Fukhemet
Fukhemet reviewed Mar 31, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@Fukhemet Fukhemet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@Fukhemet Fukhemet Fukhemet left review comments

@ashmaroli ashmaroli ashmaroli approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
frozen-due-to-age
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@parkr @ashmaroli @Fukhemet @jekyllbot