Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JENKINS-30304] Removing workaround #64

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

recena
Copy link
Contributor

@recena recena commented Nov 27, 2015

JENKINS-30304

upstream jenkinsci/jenkins#1908

@reviewbybees & @uhafner

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 27, 2015

This pull request originates from a CloudBees employee. At CloudBees, we require that all pull requests be reviewed by other CloudBees employees before we seek to have the change accepted. If you want to learn more about our process please see this explanation.

@uhafner
Copy link
Member

uhafner commented Nov 28, 2015

Until a fix for JENKINS-30304 is part of latest and lts core this test will fail. So shouldn't we keep the todo tag (or this PR) until your fix is part of lts core?

I (or you) can create a new test for analysis-collector plug-in (based on this test) that has a @SInCE annotation with the core version that contains the fix.

@recena
Copy link
Contributor Author

recena commented Dec 2, 2015

@uhafner 👍

@recena
Copy link
Contributor Author

recena commented Dec 7, 2015

@uhafner jenkinsci/jenkins#1908 was merged.

@recena
Copy link
Contributor Author

recena commented Dec 13, 2015

@uhafner ping.

@uhafner
Copy link
Member

uhafner commented Dec 13, 2015

I will get back to this during christmas break...

@recena
Copy link
Contributor Author

recena commented Dec 13, 2015

@uhafner Perfect!

@uhafner
Copy link
Member

uhafner commented Dec 18, 2015

Obsolete (See 9a50640)

@uhafner uhafner closed this Dec 18, 2015
@recena recena deleted the JENKINS-30304 branch December 18, 2015 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants