Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UX-431] Externalize some packages #232

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jun 7, 2016
Merged

[UX-431] Externalize some packages #232

merged 7 commits into from Jun 7, 2016

Conversation

tfennelly
Copy link
Member

Related to issue UX-431.

Externalizes some of the NPM packages used in the web and dashboard plugins.

I had to make a bugfix to js-builder and so also included a possible fix for JENKINS-35180

@reviewbybees

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@jenkins-cd/js-extensions",
"version": "0.0.14",
"version": "0.0.15-beta4",
Copy link
Member Author

@tfennelly tfennelly Jun 6, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes ... I need to do a proper (non --tag) release before merging this PR.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've taken a look at this PR on my windows machine and I can successfully build the dashboard now but there are several test failures.

Video(4:30 min) with my repo steps: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFe-ubQ-VdA?version=3&vq=hd1080]

Build Summary: https://gist.github.com/ianceicys/eafeba18ae28435cdaaf76dc4c7bb385

nohup test failure - https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4759fee0a0218fe9cb5aa4324a2111d1

sh test failure - https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c554be4948c2bd949de1222dc437c005

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A lot of the tests use "sh" steps in pipeline, which I don't think will work on windows. They could be changed to simply echo output - and then work across platforms (and would serve the same purpose, as long as the assertions are still there).

@michaelneale
Copy link
Member

🐝 I think this looks good.

really just trying to trigger another PR build ;)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants