Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JENKINS-15604] Trigger form validation when saving CodeMirror field #7071

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 13, 2022

Conversation

daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

@daniel-beck daniel-beck commented Sep 6, 2022

See JENKINS-15604.

Interactive testing notes

There's currently no form field that benefits from this in core (or, AFAICT, in plugins, since they all apply the workaround from a comment to JENKINS-15604). I recommend debugging the test and stopping after the job is configured, then navigating there.

Proposed changelog entries

  • Trigger form validation events after editing a CodeMirror formatted text area.

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • (If applicable) Jira issue is well described
  • Changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developer, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood. Examples
    • Fill-in the Proposed changelog entries section only if there are breaking changes or other changes which may require extra steps from users during the upgrade
  • Appropriate autotests or explanation to why this change has no tests
  • New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadoc, as appropriate.
  • New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO") if applicable.
  • New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content-Security-Policy directives (see documentation on jenkins.io).
  • For dependency updates: links to external changelogs and, if possible, full diffs

Desired reviewers

@mention

Maintainer checklist

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

  • There are at least 2 approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change
  • Conversations in the pull request are over OR it is explicit that a reviewer does not block the change
  • Changelog entries in the PR title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the PR title. (example)
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

@NotMyFault NotMyFault added the rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted label Sep 6, 2022
@daniel-beck daniel-beck added bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features and removed rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted labels Sep 6, 2022
@NotMyFault
Copy link
Member

This PR is now ready for merge. We will merge it after ~24 hours if there is no negative feedback.
Please see the merge process documentation for more information about the merge process.
Thanks!

@NotMyFault NotMyFault added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label Sep 13, 2022
@basil basil merged commit 430376e into jenkinsci:master Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback
Projects
None yet
3 participants