Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Completing buffer module, for #112 #114

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ILyoan
Copy link
Contributor

@ILyoan ILyoan commented Jul 1, 2015

Completing buffer module, for #112

  • Refactoring JObjectWrap, moving jholder from JHandlerWrap.
  • Renaming confusing member name 'jnative' to 'jobject'.
  • Completing buffer module.
    • Buffer.isBuffer()
    • Buffer.prototype.equals()
    • Buffer.prototype.compare()
    • Buffer.prototype.copy()
    • Buffer.prototype.slice()
    • Buffer.prototype.toString()
  • Revisit buffer tester.

IoT.js-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Ilyong Cho ily.cho@samsung.com

@chunseoklee
Copy link
Contributor

I'll make a new issue to support negative index in buf.slice.
Except this, LGTM.
Lets push.

@ILyoan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ILyoan commented Jul 1, 2015

@seanshpark Fixed typo
This PR modified JObjectWrap hence will conflict with PR #113.

@seanshpark
Copy link
Contributor

@ILyoan , it's ok with the conflict, it can be resolved.

@ILyoan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ILyoan commented Jul 2, 2015

@chunseoklee Rebase on top of master.
Addressed #116.
r?

@chunseoklee
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM lets push

* Refactoring JObjectWrap, moving jholder from JHandlerWrap.
* Renaming confusing member name 'jnative' to 'jobject'.
* Completing buffer module.
 * Buffer.isBuffer()
 * Buffer.prototype.equals()
 * Buffer.prototype.compare()
 * Buffer.prototype.copy()
 * Buffer.prototype.slice()
 * Buffer.prototype.toString()
* Revisit buffer tester.

IoT.js-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Ilyong Cho ily.cho@samsung.com
@ILyoan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ILyoan commented Jul 3, 2015

merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants