New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any plans on making a snappy packages? (Question) #20
Comments
If there is such demand, I could do it by directly contributing But I would better like not to be the one who uploads to Snap store. NOTE for Jesse: you already have a launchpad account so there is simply no need to make another account and Canonical provides this service for automatic builds straight from Github repo. |
Agreed. Personally, I would prefer to have the snappy package available for download instead of having to manually download the linux binary myself, but that's just me being lazy! |
I'm happy to do this if I can get some guidance on what needs to be done :P |
I'll try to tackle this today. |
Seems like you are using goreleaser and it has snapcraft support: Maybe we should do it this way? Also, I think that classic confinement will be required, because using strict one, lazydocker cannot communicate with docker installed not as snap. Which leads us to another problem - classicaly confined snaps need manual approval from Canonical, to be accepted into Store. It's a single action, but still. |
I made two variants:
IMO goreleaser would be better in that case. Already tested it, builds and runs fine. |
Love the project, this is awesome, great job!
I was wondering, do you have any plans on making a snappy package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: