-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: fix benchmark tests #173
Conversation
1085c68
to
dc5c5f8
Compare
jinahub/indexers/searcher/compound/FaissPostgresSearcher/faisspsql.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not super happy about the non-executor specific integration tests. Now, that we have the FaissPostgres combination we might want to outsource all the dump-reload mechanism testing towards only this indexer soon. (not in this PR)
jinahub/indexers/searcher/compound/FaissPostgresSearcher/faisspsql.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jinahub/indexers/searcher/compound/FaissPostgresSearcher/tests/unit/test_unit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
f2de150
to
127ff4e
Compare
d2257ff
to
de5542b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
jinahub/indexers/searcher/compound/FaissPostgresSearcher/tests/integration/test_208.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
a83c181
to
900c6ae
Compare
900c6ae
to
ebe7ea8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Various fixes for the PSQLFaiss benchmarks and tests
Also fixes #208