Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WebDAV Integration for images and other files shared in Jitsi conversations #5412

Closed
sunjam opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 13 comments
Closed
Labels
feature-request Issue which suggest an idea, enhancement or feature to implement

Comments

@sunjam
Copy link

sunjam commented Mar 26, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem you are facing?
I'm hoping for WebDAV integration as it is supported on every operating system and all mobile device, plus is used by a number of file sharing systems: Nextcloud, Owncloud, Pydio, Filerun, FileStash, SeaFile, web hosting services, etc.

Describe the solution you'd like
Please consider adding support for WebDAV as you have with S3/Minio.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Adding Jitsi storage through Minio/S3 integration, but it is a roundabout way to add this functionality. Thanks for your consideration. :)

Different request, but here is a request for CalDAV calendar support, which is another open standard.

@luixxiul luixxiul added the feature-request Issue which suggest an idea, enhancement or feature to implement label May 20, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 22, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Aug 22, 2020
@sunjam
Copy link
Author

sunjam commented Aug 23, 2020

Please leave open.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Aug 23, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 22, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Nov 22, 2020
@didierm
Copy link

didierm commented Nov 23, 2020

Go away, bot.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Nov 23, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 21, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Jul 21, 2021
@sunjam
Copy link
Author

sunjam commented Jul 21, 2021 via email

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Jul 21, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 9, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Jan 9, 2022
@didierm
Copy link

didierm commented Jan 10, 2022

ping

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Jan 10, 2022
@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Jan 11, 2022

We have no plans to add native WebDAV support at this time. Jibri can record to arbitrary storage using the finalizer script.

@saghul saghul closed this as completed Jan 11, 2022
@WhyNotHugo
Copy link

WhyNotHugo commented Jan 11, 2022

Jibri seems to require setting up one's own infrastructure.

There will be no way to record meetings without maintaining our own infrastructure?

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Jan 11, 2022

See #5800

@WhyNotHugo
Copy link

That issue seems to be in the same state: closed / WONTFIX, right?

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Jan 11, 2022

Correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request Issue which suggest an idea, enhancement or feature to implement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants