Use Terser instead of Closure Compiler #426
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Oh wow, you already did it 😅 Thanks! |
|
It's smaller and faster to compile 🔥 |
elShiaLabeouf
pushed a commit
to elShiaLabeouf/two.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2021
Use Terser instead of Closure Compiler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was an oversight in #424, sorry!
Closure Compiler fails to parse custom JSDoc annotations and errors out (despite the fact that they're comments...)
Terser doesn't have those issues, and produces a very similar bundle size (actually ~2kb smaller) while also being much faster.