Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[com_categories] Cleaner tree view #10213

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 17, 2016
Merged

Conversation

andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor

@andrepereiradasilva andrepereiradasilva commented May 3, 2016

Pull Request for Improvement.

Summary of Changes

This PR is a proposal to make a better visual to the trees in the list views of isis.

If accepted i can do in the other tree views (tags, menu items, etc).

As you can see from the code difference is just one line of code that changes.

Before PR (current scenario)

image

After PR (proposed scenario)

image

Testing Instructions

  1. Use latest staging (the difference is more visible)
  2. Apply patch
  3. Go to content categories and check the visual difference
  4. Do also some searches (with and without patch to check the difference)

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

Not convinced myself that this is any better than the current option. I
find that as the symbol looks like a letter L my eyes try to read it.

On 3 May 2016 at 14:45, andrepereiradasilva notifications@github.com
wrote:

Pull Request for Improvement.
Summary of Changes

This PR is a proposal to make a better visual to the trees in the list
views of isis.

If accepted i can do in the other tree views (tags, menu items, etc).

As you can see from the code difference is just one line of code that
changes.
Before PR (current scenario)

[image: image]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9630530/14984924/1e3146f2-113d-11e6-8782-1528e84ea7a8.png
After PR (proposed scenario)

[image: image]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9630530/14984919/1a8e8190-113d-11e6-8372-425be9e6e13f.png
Testing Instructions

  1. Use latest staging (the difference is more visible)
  2. Apply patch
  3. Go to content categories and check the visual difference
  4. Do also some searches (with and without patch to check the
    difference)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#10213
Commit Summary

  • cleaner tree

File Changes

Patch Links:


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10213

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

andrepereiradasilva commented May 3, 2016

we can add another symbol.
The main propose of this is to better understand the tree view and it's levels just by looking.

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

I understand the aim - I was just pointing out an issue (for me) with the
chosen symbol

On 3 May 2016 at 15:25, andrepereiradasilva notifications@github.com
wrote:

we can add another symbol.
The main propose of this is to better understand the tree view and it's
levels.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10213 (comment)

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

What do you think about changing your three vertical dots with a dash or even an elipsis (love the muted class you are using) and then using ↳ ↳


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok! will give it another try when i have time.

@BurtNL
Copy link
Contributor

BurtNL commented May 4, 2016

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on 28ffdc3

Tested, works as described. The view has become clearer to me.
Looking forward to the setup as proposed by @brianteeman


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

andrepereiradasilva commented May 4, 2016

well i think it's a matter of taste.

some examples:

image

image

image

image

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

BTW, htmlentities used http://www.w3schools.com/charsets/ref_utf_box.asp

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

i prefer the last one because it's cleaner.

@BurtNL
Copy link
Contributor

BurtNL commented May 4, 2016

I agree with @andrepereiradasilva, I prefer the last example too.


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@pe7er
Copy link
Contributor

pe7er commented May 8, 2016

Great! Thanks @andrepereiradasilva, this is a huge UX improvement!

IMHO this version is the most clear one:
Category-overview


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

andrepereiradasilva commented May 8, 2016

lol, each one likes a different one.
I think this is going to have to be a PLT decision.

The goal is to apply this to all the items with tree structures (menus, access level, tags, categories, etc) so we can have a consistent tree structure across all views.

pinging @wilsonge for a decision.

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

Set to Needs Review - not sure if its PLT or UI team on this one


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@wilsonge
Copy link
Contributor

wilsonge commented May 8, 2016

I prefer the last one (i.e. https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9630530/15011868/1e7a8592-11ec-11e6-9e4e-69e91f4a7292.png) - I think the arrows Brian proposed are not rendering consistently between platforms (I can see large differences between windows and mac). So I think this is the next best solution

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

is that a opinion or a decision?

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

I think I agree with @wilsonge

Can you update the PR to use that styling so it can be tested in real life


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes, once i remember the character i used for the dash 😉

@joomla-cms-bot
Copy link

This PR has received new commits.

CC: @BurtNL


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok done

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

Are you sure thats the correct symbol the dash looks very narrow
screen shot 2016-05-16 at 16 46 32


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

hum Mac right?
in Windows
image

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

yes - a mac ;)

On 16 May 2016 at 22:50, andrepereiradasilva notifications@github.com
wrote:

hum Mac right?
in Windows
[image: image]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9630530/15305025/9f136ebe-1bb8-11e6-85e8-da0ccb4da20c.png


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10213 (comment)

Brian Teeman
Co-founder Joomla! and OpenSourceMatters Inc.
http://brian.teeman.net/

@joomla-cms-bot
Copy link

This PR has received new commits.

CC: @BurtNL


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

is ok now?

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on e0d3450


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@brianteeman
Copy link
Contributor

Yes thats it - screenshot for reference

screen shot 2016-05-16 at 17 02 35


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok @wilsonge, so do we have an ok on this tree view?

@wilsonge
Copy link
Contributor

Yes :)

@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok then, so when this gets tested and eventually merged i will do PR for the others tree like structures (tags, menus and user groups).

@MATsxm
Copy link

MATsxm commented May 17, 2016

I have tested this item ✅ successfully on e0d3450

Like this way 👍 - thanks


This comment was created with the J!Tracker Application at issues.joomla.org/joomla-cms/10213.

@wilsonge wilsonge added this to the Joomla 3.6.0 milestone May 17, 2016
@wilsonge wilsonge merged commit 3b8e664 into joomla:staging May 17, 2016
@wilsonge
Copy link
Contributor

You'd better get moving then :) Merged with two good tests!

@andrepereiradasilva andrepereiradasilva deleted the patch-7 branch May 17, 2016 12:24
@andrepereiradasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

no pressure right? ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants