Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the scope of in place import more explicit (edits) #5

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 12, 2019

Conversation

mtbc
Copy link

@mtbc mtbc commented Jun 11, 2019

Just a couple of thoughts for you to cherry-pick or merge as you like.

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ In-place import
===============

In-place import allows files which are already present on the server machine
to be imported into OMERO without the need to copy them into OMERO's ManagedRepository. This requires
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might be a question for @fmeyenhofer. He added this specifically trying to get something across.


Do not use soft links when pointing to data inside the
ManagedRepository. If the originals are deleted, the data will be
lost.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the piece of information was missing for me. Good idea to add it.

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ In-place import
===============

In-place import allows files which are already present on the server machine

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rephrasing: In-place import allows image files that are accessible from the OMERO.server's filesystem...

(because they do not have to be stored on the server machine, but can be on any machine if mounted into the servers FS)

@joshmoore
Copy link
Owner

Merging to update the commit.

@joshmoore joshmoore merged commit e20c82b into joshmoore:1983-felix Jun 12, 2019
@mtbc mtbc deleted the 1983-felix branch June 12, 2019 07:07
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants