Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Twitter blocks links from jsfiddle.net #1417

Closed
zalun opened this issue Jan 25, 2019 · 11 comments
Closed

Twitter blocks links from jsfiddle.net #1417

zalun opened this issue Jan 25, 2019 · 11 comments
Assignees

Comments

@zalun
Copy link
Member

zalun commented Jan 25, 2019

Twitter is rejecting posts with JSFiddle URL inside.
If a URL shortener is used the unsafe page warning is displayed[1]
What is causing that?[2]

[1]
screenshot 2019-01-25 07 20 22
[2] We've tried to contact Twitter, but no answer.

@oskarkrawczyk
Copy link
Member

oskarkrawczyk commented Jan 25, 2019

At some point in the past crypto scammers used JSFiddle to host pages with a wallet code and posted links to that on Twitter.

Due to the nature of JSFiddle, anyone can post anything, so wallet codes are ok – we did implemented a content filter to shadow-ban these.

I asked Twitter if they they could help out and ban twitter accounts that were posting scam tweets that included links to the rogue fiddles.

Twitter just went the easy route and blocked all jsfiddle.net links instead of blocking spammer accounts on their platform.

Tried to contact Twitter many many times, with no reply whatsoever. They most likely have no-explanation-needed-policy, which is why they never replied.

There's nothing that can be done here unless somebody has contact to a higher op at Twitter who has the decision power to help out here.

@oskarkrawczyk oskarkrawczyk changed the title DISCUSS: Make fiddles show up on Twitter Twitter blocks links from jsfiddle.net Feb 8, 2019
@oskarkrawczyk oskarkrawczyk pinned this issue Feb 8, 2019
@tomglynch
Copy link

By wallet code you mean a crypto mining script yes?

@applefreak
Copy link

applefreak commented Jun 7, 2019

By wallet code you mean a crypto mining script yes?

I think I saw some variant of this. It's one of those "send some ETH and receive 2x more back!" With fake "live" transaction listing and fake testimonials.

Edit: if memory serves me correct, the transactions being listed are actually not fake, though the live aspect is. Same transaction always reappear as if they're new if you refresh, and those transactions is the 2x amount that got send back. It's all just the scammers trying to make the site look legit.

@oskarkrawczyk
Copy link
Member

@tomglynch No, I mean a wallet code, pretty much as @applefreak explained.

@jetrois

This comment has been minimized.

@thecodeboy

This comment has been minimized.

@oskarkrawczyk oskarkrawczyk self-assigned this Jun 7, 2019
@Duologic
Copy link

Duologic commented Jun 7, 2019

This is starting to become a complain thread, please keep it on topic.

@jahrichie
Copy link

I preface what i'm about to say with Twitter sux...but why should twitter help your organization find a problem originating in your systems? Seems like YOU guys tried to take the easy way out, not them.

Find a better way to validate the issue, plug the hole, and reach out to twitter. If they don't unblock your sharing urls, change them to a new url and reverse proxy the other url or something -- don't blame a social network for making a PERFECTLY ethical decision.

@anko
Copy link

anko commented Jun 7, 2019

@jahrichie

validate the issue, plug the hole, and reach out to twitter

They did those things.

Quoting @oskarkrawczyk's above post:

we did implemented a content filter to shadow-ban these

Tried to contact Twitter many many times, with no reply whatsoever

What more do you think should be done?

@rafaelcavalcante

This comment has been minimized.

@oskarkrawczyk
Copy link
Member

@zalun managed to get in touch with someone from Twitter and get us unblocked 🎉

@oskarkrawczyk oskarkrawczyk unpinned this issue Jun 16, 2019
@jsfiddle jsfiddle locked as too heated and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants