Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
or
.
Download ZIP

Loading…

Make link to RDF more apparent in the specification #180

Closed
msporny opened this Issue · 12 comments

6 participants

@msporny
Owner

The following specific change was requested by @prototypo in May/June 2012 and again at the last RDF WG Face to Face meeting:

[The JSON-LD Syntax specification] must mention RDF up front and somewhere later the details must make it clear that JSON-LD is a legitimate serialization of the RDF data model.

We would be able to do this in the introduction, and possibly in the abstract.

@lanthaler
Owner
@prototypo
@lanthaler
Owner

PROPOSAL: Add a statement in the introduction of the JSON-LD syntax specification saying that JSON-LD is a legitimate serialization of the RDF data model.

@gkellogg
Owner

+1, but without "legitimate"

@msporny
Owner

+1, but without "legitimate"

@prototypo
@cygri
Collaborator

Should probably be specific about whether it's a syntax for RDF graphs or RDF datasets (or both), so this may have a dependency on #183.

@niklasl
Collaborator

+1, but without "legitimate". Also agree that the graph vs. dataset issue needs to be solved.

@cygri
Collaborator

+1. As I said, #183 needs to be resolved, but this doesn't actually block this issue.

@lanthaler
Owner

RESOLVED: Add a statement in the introduction of the JSON-LD syntax specification saying that JSON-LD is a serialization of the RDF data model.

@lanthaler lanthaler referenced this issue from a commit
@lanthaler lanthaler Add statement in the introduction of the syntax spec that JSON-LD is …
…a serialization for RDF graphs and datasets

This addresses #180.
16e4dc8
@lanthaler
Owner

I added the statement to the spec. Unless I hear objections I will close this issue in 24 hours.

@lanthaler lanthaler closed this
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.