Develop td media consolidate

[tydillon]

Consolidates both media models

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #13 into develop will increase coverage by 16.06%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             develop      #13       +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage      39.37%   55.44%   +16.06%     
+ Complexity       532      530        -2     
==============================================
  Files            124       80       -44     
  Lines           2900     2056      -844     
  Branches           1        1               
==============================================
- Hits            1142     1140        -2     
+ Misses          1758      916      -842     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...redox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Author.java	64.86% <ø> (ø)	11.00 <0.00> (ø)
...edox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Company.java	60.00% <ø> (ø)	6.00 <0.00> (ø)
...ox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Custodian.java	58.82% <ø> (ø)	5.00 <0.00> (ø)
...redox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Header.java	60.00% <ø> (ø)	6.00 <0.00> (ø)
...edox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Insured.java	63.63% <ø> (ø)	10.00 <0.00> (ø)
...va/redox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/PCP.java	64.86% <ø> (ø)	11.00 <0.00> (ø)
...dox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Producer.java	58.82% <ø> (ø)	5.00 <0.00> (ø)
...dox/datamodel/clinicalsummary/common/Relation.java	60.86% <ø> (ø)	7.00 <0.00> (ø)
...tamodel/clinicalsummary/patientpush/Encounter.java	67.92% <ø> (ø)	15.00 <0.00> (ø)
...model/clinicalsummary/patientpush/PatientPush.java	71.69% <ø> (ø)	33.00 <0.00> (ø)
... and 30 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 34da702...3a7cee2. Read the comment docs.

[jtravan3]

See if my comments make sense. We can go ahead and merge this if we want but we should probably do another consolidation of all the common packages into a single redox.datamodel.common package.

[jtravan3]

Should we have a redox.datamodel.common instead? Because we already have an Address object right? Rather than doing common objects per Redox module we should probably do an overall common

[jtravan3]

LGTM ✅