-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Notebook-only mode: provide a 1 to ~1 equivalent of notebook classic, implemented using jupyterlab api #8450
Comments
Missed the call today, but here are some thoughts from prior casual conversations with @afshin about this topic:
Discourse is also another place where the differences between lab and classic have been discussed. It would be interesting to ask some of the folks there to know what they would expect of a classic mode in lab. |
my attempt at doing exactly this: https://github.com/yuvipanda/simplest-notebook |
Yes, that is the look and experience that I would want (and I did know of this from before) ❤️ The current hope is to make such an interface but have it be able to pick up installed lab extensions that work on the notebook, e.g. various ipywidgets extensions, etc. One way of achieving this would be to have this be a special "mode" you could put lab in. |
Currently exploring this idea in https://github.com/jtpio/jupyterlab-classic (still a very early prototype) With a working Binder to try it out (pinned on a commit): https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/jtpio/jupyterlab-classic/cdc11d709bfb698074c75a47665caac50b3f1670?urlpath=classic/notebooks/binder/example.ipynb |
While this is super impressive work, I think this needs more discussion. To entirely replicate the classic notebook (which has been frozen in time for many year and not itself improved significantly) misses the mark. We got years of feedback about the classic notebook that led us to create JupyterLab. Users and extension authors wanted a more powerful and complex layout system and there are many classic notebook extensions hack around these limitations in painful ways. While there is a lot more work needed, I believe the Simple/Single Document Mode of JupyterLab is a good start in finding the right tradeoffs between the elements of the classic notebook that users miss, and the extensibility and layout that classic notebook users were asking for. |
Love this, @jtpio! @ellisonbg for a lot of use cases, I think having 1:1 replication of classic notebook is a great transition step for folks already used to the UX + docs that point to it. I don't think this will go into JupyterLab classic, but IMO it's important to encourage this kinda work - both to possibly deploy it, but also to make sure that JupyterLab components are truly usable outside of JupyterLab itself. |
+1
+1 |
As an example, I'm just in a video call where someone is teaching new faculty how to use the notebook, with the classic UI. There's a lot of these, and would need to be updated before they can use JupyterLab, even in single document mode. Having something that's more visually equal will be an easier transition, and then we can move them slowly over afterwards if needed. |
Thanks Yuvi! This is heavily inspired and motivated by your work on the simplest notebook, as well as the work from the cal poly interns on the clarity mode. I think there is indeed room for both JupyterLab and an alternative distribution like JupyterLab Classic. Users can switch between the two as they wish. Especially since most components are directly reused from JupyterLab. Some updates:
|
We at BlueConic offer the classic Jupyter UI within our product, to offer the user a nice way of using their profile data with python code and do machine learning and such. More information on our usage: https://support.blueconic.com/hc/en-us/articles/360020125234-BlueConic-AI-Workbench |
Hi @paulrutter, let me know if you would like to connect with us at @QuantStack to discuss your usecase. The team comprises 6 core devs of Jupyter and we develop and provide professional support around the Jupyter ecosystem. Along the lines of this "classic notebook" experience, @jtpio recently published "jupyterlab-classic" which provides that kind of experience (see https://github.com/jtpio/jupyterlab-classic/). |
@SylvainCorlay We're certainly open for discussing our usecase (and why we need/want something like JupyterLab Classic). |
@paulrutter sorry I missed your message. Please feel free to reach out to me directly by email. Sending you a message to start a thread right now. |
Hi, With latest version of jupyter eco-system on windows, my Jupyter-notebook fails to opens its main page. I hope this transition will come soon. |
Closing in favor of #9869 In the meantime, JupyterLab Classic has been renamed to RetroLab and has been moved to the It is still installable with pip / mamba / conda for those who want to use it as a standalone application. |
As discussed in the 5/20/20 meeting, one perennial feature request for jlab has been a mode that looks and feels exactly the same as notebook classic. Some people don't like the filebrowser, or the side bars, or anything that pulls focus from a single notebook experience, etc. More broadly, there's a huge swath of classic notebook users who currently haven't migrated to jlab but might do so if the UI/UX was basically identical.
There are a number of different ways we could implement such a thing. Some basic sketches:
Some things to consider:
pinging @ellisonbg @afshin @jasongrout @vidartf @ajbozarth @lucbouchard1 @nproctor @declanvk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: