Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add viewpoint validation #488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2023
Merged

Add viewpoint validation #488

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2023

Conversation

k1LoW
Copy link
Owner

@k1LoW k1LoW commented Jun 15, 2023

No description provided.

@k1LoW k1LoW self-assigned this Jun 15, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Code Metrics Report

main (7c64609) #488 (86a6d3a) +/-
Coverage 64.6% 62.5% -2.1%
Code to Test Ratio 1:0.4 1:0.4 -0.0
Test Execution Time 5m23s 3m52s -1m31s
Details
  |                     | main (7c64609) | #488 (86a6d3a) |  +/-   |
  |---------------------|----------------|----------------|--------|
- | Coverage            |          64.6% |          62.5% |  -2.1% |
  |   Files             |             36 |             36 |      0 |
  |   Lines             |           3677 |           3682 |     +5 |
- |   Covered           |           2374 |           2300 |    -74 |
- | Code to Test Ratio  |          1:0.4 |          1:0.4 |   -0.0 |
  |   Code              |           9579 |           9587 |     +8 |
  |   Test              |           3880 |           3880 |      0 |
+ | Test Execution Time |          5m23s |          3m52s | -1m31s |

Code coverage of files in pull request scope (60.1% → 59.6%)

Files Coverage +/-
config/config.go 59.6% -0.5%

Reported by octocov

@k1LoW k1LoW merged commit 0dddf16 into main Jun 15, 2023
3 checks passed
@k1LoW k1LoW deleted the viewpoint-validatiton branch June 15, 2023 21:09
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant