Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak netpol node wait logs #9581

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

brandond
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

Tweak netpol node wait logs

Types of Changes

bugfix; nit

Verification

See linked issue

Testing

Linked Issues

User-Facing Change


Further Comments

Signed-off-by: Brad Davidson <brad.davidson@rancher.com>
@brandond brandond requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2024 01:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 42.83%. Comparing base (86f1021) to head (a231c19).

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/agent/netpol/netpol.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9581      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.01%   42.83%   -6.19%     
==========================================
  Files         151      154       +3     
  Lines       13471    13524      +53     
==========================================
- Hits         6603     5793     -810     
- Misses       5545     6562    +1017     
+ Partials     1323     1169     -154     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2etests ?
inttests 39.40% <0.00%> (+0.42%) ⬆️
unittests 15.96% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants