Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operator security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) #1672

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Contributor

@saschagrunert saschagrunert commented Sep 5, 2022

Thanks submitting your Operator. Please check below list before you create your Pull Request.

New Submissions

Updates to existing Operators

  • Did you create a ci.yaml file according to the update instructions?
  • Is your new CSV pointing to the previous version with the replaces property if you chose replaces-mode via the updateGraph property in ci.yaml?
  • Is your new CSV referenced in the appropriate channel defined in the package.yaml or annotations.yaml ?
  • Have you tested an update to your Operator when deployed via OLM?
  • Is your submission signed?

Your submission should not

  • Modify more than one operator
  • Modify an Operator you don't own
  • Rename an operator - please remove and add with a different name instead
  • Modify any files outside the above mentioned folders
  • Contain more than one commit. Please squash your commits.

Operator Description must contain (in order)

  1. Description about the managed Application and where to find more information
  2. Features and capabilities of your Operator and how to use it
  3. Any manual steps about potential pre-requisites for using your Operator

Operator Metadata should contain

  • Human readable name and 1-liner description about your Operator
  • Valid category name1
  • One of the pre-defined capability levels2
  • Links to the maintainer, source code and documentation
  • Example templates for all Custom Resource Definitions intended to be used
  • A quadratic logo

Remember that you can preview your CSV here.

--

1 If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file an issue against this repo and explain your need

2 For more information see here

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title operators [N] [CI] security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) operator security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) Sep 5, 2022
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title operator security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) operator [CI} security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) Sep 5, 2022
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title operator [CI} security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) operator [CI] security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) Sep 5, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dear @saschagrunert,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (security-profiles-operator/0.4.3) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.19.1 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha2, Kind=SelinuxProfile: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=ProfileBinding: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=SecurityProfileNodeStatus: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (security-profiles-operator.v0.4.3) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

@JAORMX,@saschagrunert,@pjbgf,, please approve as you are original reviewer(s).

  • To add more contributors to ci.yaml follow instruction here.
  • To approve follow instruction here

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title operator [CI] security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) operator security-profiles-operator (0.4.3) Sep 5, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dear @saschagrunert,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (security-profiles-operator/0.4.3) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.19.1 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=SecurityProfileNodeStatus: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha2, Kind=SelinuxProfile: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=ProfileBinding: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (security-profiles-operator.v0.4.3) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dear @saschagrunert,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (security-profiles-operator/0.4.3) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.19.1 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=SecurityProfileNodeStatus: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha2, Kind=SelinuxProfile: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=ProfileBinding: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (security-profiles-operator.v0.4.3) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dear @saschagrunert,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (security-profiles-operator/0.4.3) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.19.1 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=SecurityProfileNodeStatus: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha2, Kind=SelinuxProfile: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value security-profiles-operator.x-k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=ProfileBinding: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (security-profiles-operator.v0.4.3) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2022

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation framework-automation merged commit 372ad1e into k8s-operatorhub:main Sep 5, 2022
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the spo-0.4.3 branch September 5, 2022 11:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants