Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why not includes the GraphQL? #562

Closed
xgqfrms opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

why not includes the GraphQL? #562

xgqfrms opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@xgqfrms
Copy link

xgqfrms commented Feb 18, 2019

why not includes the GraphQL?

I think it will be the trending of new API development, just like GitHub version 4.

https://github.com/topics/github-api
https://developer.github.com/

@Firefishy
Copy link

In which chart? Frontend? Backend? DevOps?

@xgqfrms
Copy link
Author

xgqfrms commented Feb 20, 2019

Frontend

@smoke
Copy link

smoke commented Feb 21, 2019

It should be in backend as well.

@Bastorx
Copy link

Bastorx commented Mar 4, 2019

Both side Back and Front and Apollo as favorite tech. After maybe Relay.... others (I don't know others well o_O)

@kamranahmedse
Copy link
Owner

This has been fixed and will be published in the coming release. Thank you 🙏

@acao
Copy link

acao commented Feb 23, 2020

I daresay that in Backend, GraphQL should be in "Learn about APIs" at this point, given the rate of adoption. REST should definately be learned always as a prerequesite to implementing GraphQL over HTTP, so the "learn at any time" legend key would remain, though GraphQL has a much broader scope and application than HTTP webservice APIs, all of it's applications would fall under the broad category of "APIs".

Should I open a new ticket?

that said, the place where it sits still makes sense, since it tends to be at the front of a "backend" stack (for example, to stitch service interfaces together into a common schema)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants