-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GHA: no static check for s390x #8482
Labels
Projects
Comments
BbolroC
added
enhancement
Improvement to an existing feature
needs-review
Needs to be assessed by the team.
labels
Nov 21, 2023
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 21, 2023
This is to add the unit test for s390x by incorporating it with the existing static checks. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 22, 2023
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2023
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2023
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2023
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
Amulyam24
pushed a commit
to Amulyam24/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
Amulyam24
pushed a commit
to Amulyam24/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
BbolroC
added a commit
to BbolroC/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
LindaYu17
pushed a commit
to LindaYu17/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
c3d
pushed a commit
to c3d/kata-containers
that referenced
this issue
Feb 23, 2024
As part of the CI migration from Jenkins to GitHub Action, a CI job named `kata-containers-2.0-ubuntu-s390x-unit-PR` is covered by the static check. This commit is to enable the check for s390x by incorporating a runner `s390x` with the corresponding workflow. Fixes: kata-containers#8482 Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Which feature do you think can be improved?
As part of the migration of CI jobs from Jenkins to GitHub Action, the unit test is not instituted yet. We have to implement it by incorporating with the static checks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: