feat: adapt code to use KeptnWorkloadVersion instead of KeptnWorkloadInstance

[odubajDT]

Fixes: #66

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for keptn-lifecycle-toolkit ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	f728b31
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/keptn-lifecycle-toolkit/deploys/6527dacc59b1a20008f00886
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2255--keptn-lifecycle-toolkit.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2255 (f728b31) into main (8dd3394) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 82.53%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2255      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.57%   85.65%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         159      159              
  Lines       10236    10227       -9     
==========================================
+ Hits         8759     8760       +1     
+ Misses       1202     1192      -10     
  Partials      275      275              

Files	Coverage Δ
...-operator/apis/lifecycle/v1alpha3/common/phases.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...tor/apis/lifecycle/v1alpha3/keptnworkload_types.go	88.88% <ø> (-5.06%)	⬇️
...s/lifecycle/v1alpha4/keptnworkloadversion_types.go	99.06% <100.00%> (+3.56%)	⬆️
...rator/controllers/common/schedulinggateshandler.go	81.03% <100.00%> (ø)
...ontrollers/lifecycle/keptnappversion/controller.go	82.30% <ø> (ø)
...eptnworkloadversion/reconcile_prepostdeployment.go	81.81% <100.00%> (ø)
...eptnworkloadversion/reconcile_prepostevaluation.go	90.90% <100.00%> (ø)
...ecycle/keptnappversion/reconcile_workloadsstate.go	93.75% <90.90%> (ø)
.../keptnworkloadversion/reconcile_deploymentstate.go	72.22% <87.50%> (ø)
...perator/controllers/common/telemetry/otel_utils.go	73.83% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 3 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Flag	Coverage Δ
certificate-operator	67.19% <ø> (ø)
component-tests	59.18% <73.28%> (+1.07%)	⬆️
lifecycle-operator	85.45% <57.86%> (-1.07%)	⬇️
metrics-operator	87.55% <ø> (ø)
scheduler	32.12% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[RealAnna]

should we make a refactoring issue for this guy? https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL&pullRequest=2255&id=keptn_lifecycle-toolkit&open=AYsU8dz3bEml1DOqvng7

[odubajDT]

should we make a refactoring issue for this guy? https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL&pullRequest=2255&id=keptn_lifecycle-toolkit&open=AYsU8dz3bEml1DOqvng7

yep I guess we should

[RealAnna]

should we make a refactoring issue for this guy? https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL&pullRequest=2255&id=keptn_lifecycle-toolkit&open=AYsU8dz3bEml1DOqvng7

yep I guess we should

#2261

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
39 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.1% Duplication

[RealAnna]

great 👍