feat: add configurable service account to KeptnTasks

[prakrit55]

fixes:#1869

• added spec.serviceAccount.name
• use service account to generate jobs
• add integration test for the field

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for keptn-lifecycle-toolkit ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	26466fc
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/keptn-lifecycle-toolkit/deploys/65439bc435b2840008c04a9a
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2254--keptn-lifecycle-toolkit.netlify.app/docs/crd-ref/lifecycle/v1alpha3
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2254 (26466fc) into main (66668f5) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 76.92%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2254      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.50%   85.48%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       10166    10165       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         8692     8690       -2     
- Misses       1196     1197       +1     
  Partials      278      278              

Files	Coverage Δ
...rator/controllers/lifecycle/keptntask/job_utils.go	65.25% <100.00%> (+0.59%)	⬆️
...is/lifecycle/v1alpha3/keptntaskdefinition_types.go	75.00% <70.00%> (-25.00%)	⬇️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

Flag	Coverage Δ
certificate-operator	67.43% <ø> (ø)
component-tests	56.73% <100.00%> (-0.62%)	⬇️
lifecycle-operator	85.56% <76.92%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
metrics-operator	87.58% <ø> (ø)
scheduler	32.12% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[prakrit55]

hey @RealAnna, could you once review it so that I am able to know what subsequent changes require here ??

[RealAnna]

@prakrit55 we have some helm tests based on the helm chart, you will have to fix them to add the new value in the crd

[prakrit55]

and check here too
cc @mowies @RealAnna @bacherfl

[prakrit55]

hey @mowies , @odubajDT can you chek it once again, if it needs anymore stuffs to work on

[prakrit55]

Hey @prakrit55, now you can rebase to main and the test should be fixed

done 👍

[odubajDT]

Nice job! :)

[bacherfl]

looks good already, thank you for that contribution :) I just left some suggestions to make the documentation a bit tidier, but once those have been incorporated and the auto generated docs have been regenerated I think this is ready to get merged!

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication