Cannot execute Old Admin Console tests #13887
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nehachopra27
previously approved these changes
Aug 23, 2022
|
I need to check the pipeline run with the Old Account tests execution. |
mabartos
changed the title
|
@nehachopra27 Thanks for the review! It's possible to properly execute tests with the Old Admin console. https://keycloak-jenkins.com/job/universal-test-pipeline-server/2082/ The attached failures are directly related to the #10997 issue. Everything works as expected. |
|
Changed only the commit message. |
|
The QS test failures are not related to this PR. @nehachopra27 Could you please approve it again? Thanks :) |
|
Changes look good to me, Thanks! |
|
/rerun |
pdrozd
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #14005
Pipeline MR: https://keycloak-gitlab.com/keycloak/keycloak-pipeline/-/merge_requests/172
@miquelsi @nchopra27 Could you please take a look at it? Thanks