naming of properties in light of single namespace

[pmaria]

In light of the choice for a single rml namespace, names like rml:execution may not be descriptive enough anymore. I think we should consider to rename some of them.

For example in the case of rml:execution, rml:functionExecution is clearer.

[bjdmeest]

@pmaria fine if I make following changes?

• rml:ReturnMap --> rml:FunctionReturnMap
• rml:Execution --> rml:FunctionExecution
• rml:FunctionMap
• rml:Input --> rml:FunctionInput
• rml:ParameterMap --> rml:FunctionParameterMap
• rml:execution --> rml:functionExecution
• rml:returnMap --> rml:functionReturnMap
• rml:return --> rml:functionReturn
• rml:functionMap
• rml:function
• rml:input --> rml:functionInput
• rml:parameterMap --> rml:functionParameterMap
• rml:parameter --> rml:functionParameter
• rml:valueMap --> rml:functionValueMap
• rml:value --> rml:functionValue

[pmaria]

Hmm gets quite verbose. What if we keep those that could possibly be reused for other constructs unchanged?

• rml:ReturnMap
• rml:Execution --> rml:FunctionExecution
• rml:FunctionMap
• rml:Input
• rml:ParameterMap
• rml:execution --> rml:functionExecution
• rml:returnMap
• rml:return
• rml:functionMap
• rml:function
• rml:input
• rml:parameterMap
• rml:parameter
• rml:valueMap --> rml:inputValueMap (as opposed to rml:functionValueMap)
• rml:value --> rml:inputValue (as opposed to rml:functionValue)

[anaigmo]

Naming updated in development branch for the ontology, diagram and ontology documentation