New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #149 #150
Conversation
May be faster than disk I/O.
The source message does not have URNs, so strict comparison fails against the URNs auto-constructed for the round-tripped message.
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #150 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.33% 95.97% -2.37%
==========================================
Files 87 87
Lines 6443 6480 +37
==========================================
- Hits 6336 6219 -117
- Misses 107 261 +154
|
@goatsweater please let me know if you are able to check this branch against any other examples beyond the specimen you shared in #149. Meanwhile I will complete the PR checklist and prepare to merge/release. |
Collect subclass-specific logic.
Warn about unresolveable references in docs.
I'll run it against some of our production data tomorrow and let you know how things go. |
Overall things look good. I did notice that Output: <str:ConceptIdentity>
<Ref agencyID="AGENCYID" id="AUX2" maintainableParentID="CS_SAMPLE_BETA" maintainableParentVersion="1.0" version="1.0" package="conceptscheme" class="Concept"/>
</str:ConceptIdentity> Source: <structure:ConceptIdentity>
<Ref id="AUX2" maintainableParentID="CS_SAMPLE_BETA" maintainableParentVersion="1.0" agencyID="AGENCYID" package="conceptscheme" class="Concept" />
</structure:ConceptIdentity> |
Great, thanks. It doesn't make sense that a non-maintainable individual item (e.g. Concept) has a version="..."; only the maintainableParentVersion="…" for the ConceptScheme or similar should be there. I'll check and address that, then merge and release. |
Closes #149.
PR checklist
Update documentationBugfix only.