Materials for PyData2014
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
football
irt
tools
.gitignore
Elo.ipynb
IRT.ipynb
README.md
cfb2013lines.csv
conferences.csv
presentation.pdf

README.md

PyData2014 Materials

These are supplementary materials for my talk on Determining Skill Levels at PyData2NYC 2014.

Football

The football package parses and manipulates

  • cfb2013lines.csv
  • conferences.csv

cfb2013lines.csv is a csv of the winners and losers of all college football games in 2013.

conferences.csv is just a mapping from team to an abbreviation of their conference name (sorry for any inconsistencies; 2013 data is hard to get at strangely).

The package itself has three main modules:

  • base for manipulating the data
  • elo for doing Elo's method on this data
  • make_graph for producing a win/lose directed dot graph, which you should compile with fdp.

To use make_graph, simply run python football/make_graph.

To use elo, see the example in Elo.ipynb.

IRT

The IRT package contains a simple implementation of 1PL IRT with normal priors. It contains a simulate function that allows you build data sets, and then a make_irt_neg_objective function which you can use with scipy.optimize to learn the latent parameters.

For an example of usage, see IRT.ipynb.

Tools

I've also included some tools for doing finite-difference tests of jacobians and hessians. Doing finite-difference tests is critical for testing whether or not your fast implementations of these functions actually match your objective. If they do not, then you're going to quickly get in trouble with line search algorithms.

Exercises

Since this was an intermediate talk, I guess I can assign people who come here exercises:

  1. Here's a simple one. Fork this repo and add the gradients and hessians of the elo and irt objectives to the packages. No credit if you do not test these functions, which you can do with the finite-difference tests available in the tools package.

  2. Then play around with the tools. Find other data sets or simulate larger data sets. When do the tools break? What assumptions might break down?

  3. Be the BCS! Add priors to Elo's method to get your favorite team to the top. Some simple ones you could try are:

    • Put a normal prior centered at 1.0 on your favorite team's skill and a prior centered at 0.0 for everyone else's. What happens (especially, what happens to their conference)?
    • Put a prior on a whole conference. What happens?
    • Put a nondiagonal prior on the teams. For instance, try putting a prior on every conference that the skills across the conference will be normally distributed. How would you do that? Why might you think that's a reasonable prior?

License

Everything in this repository is licensed under the Apache 2.0 license.