Update zbarlight recipe to 3.0, refactor #805
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @Cheaterman, Can you please rebase on top of the |
Cheaterman
force-pushed
the
update_zbarlight
branch
from
d57e048
to
6631595
Compare
|
Done, thanks for the heads up 👍 |
misl6
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Probably should merge #804 first, although I'm not 100% certain - what's for sure is that I didn't try this recipe without refactored biglink, since it seems to me like it was required last time I worked on this (sooo much time ago already haha, it's more than time to PR everything!)