Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Labels in DomainTemplate #7647

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2020

Conversation

duglin
Copy link

@duglin duglin commented Apr 19, 2020

Allow us to access Labels in the DomainTemplate, similar to how people can
access Annotations. This allows people to create custom URLs via the
template and to choose custom domains in the config-domain configMap via
labels - instead of one via annotations and the other via labels.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis dug@us.ibm.com

/lint

Proposed Changes

  • Add support for Labels in DomainTemplate

Release Note

Can now access Labels in the DomainTemplate property in the config-network ConfigMap

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Apr 19, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 19, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@duglin: 0 warnings.

In response to this:

Allow us to access Labels in the DomainTemplate, similar to how people can
access Annotations. This allows people to create custom URLs via the
template and to choose custom domains in the config-domain configMap via
labels - instead of one via annotations and the other via labels.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis dug@us.ibm.com

/lint

Proposed Changes

  • Add support for Labels in DomainTemplate

Release Note

Can now access Labels in the DomainTemplate property in the config-network ConfigMap

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Allow us to access Labels in the DomainTemplate, similar to how people can
access Annotations. This allows people to create custom URLs via the
template and to choose custom domains in the config-domain configMap via
labels - instead of one via annotations and the other via labels.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@markusthoemmes markusthoemmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 20, 2020
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: duglin, markusthoemmes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 20, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 2db17c6 into knative:master Apr 20, 2020
@duglin duglin deleted the supportLabels branch April 20, 2020 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/API API objects and controllers area/networking cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants