[WIP] GEMM: Refactor trans-mode combinations #1539
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging |
mzuzek
changed the title
added 9 commits
September 28, 2022 11:16
mzuzek
force-pushed
the
gemm-transpose-refactoring
branch
from
cc90f20
to
2105dd9
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP: based on #1519 (review and merge first, please)
This PR reduces transpose mode combinations for GEMM A/B matrices (4 for
N/T, 9 forN/T/C, etc.) in implementations and unit tests for functor-level routines.