We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What about adding in optional context("test name") {} blocks into fun spec ?
context("test name") {}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't see any negative point in that
Sorry, something went wrong.
Let's sneak this in 3.3
Extend FunSpec to allows contexts #696
a71e1dc
No branches or pull requests
What about adding in optional
context("test name") {}
blocks into fun spec ?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: