Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the KFDef stacks example non GCP specifc. #1238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2020

Conversation

jlewi
Copy link
Contributor

@jlewi jlewi commented Jun 9, 2020

* For GCP will not be using KFDef with 1.1; instead we will be using
  blueprints (see kubeflow#1063)

* Therefore I updated the existing example of deploying using stacks
  to make it non GCP specific so that it could be used as an example
  for platforms that still want to use KFDef.

  * kubeflow#1062 is tracking migrating all KFDefs to the new versions
    of our kustomize packages
@kubeflow-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This change is Reviewable

@jlewi
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlewi commented Jun 9, 2020

/assign @yanniszark
/assign @animeshsingh
/assign @Jeffwan

@yanniszark @animeshsingh @Jeffwan who wants to review this?

Copy link
Contributor

@Bobgy Bobgy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

path: istio/gcp-1-1-6
name: istio-stack
# TODO: If you actually want to install ISTIO as part of KFDef setup you would
# need to add the appropriate package.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Q: Which istio version should application authors expect? I know for GCP it's 1.4+ (from memory, not sure if accurate). Did we upgrade from 1.1 for others, is there a plan?

e.g. KFP multi user mode will ideally use new authorization CRDs introduced after 1.2, it would make others not compatible

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we have published any requirements about minimum or maximum supported ISTIO versions. So right now I would say its up to each individual application owner to decide which versions of ISTIO to be compatible with.

@jlewi
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlewi commented Jun 10, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jlewi: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm
/approve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlewi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7a37912 into kubeflow:master Jun 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants