Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return error when ml-metadata serialized format does not match expected format. #1192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2019

Conversation

neuromage
Copy link
Contributor

@neuromage neuromage commented Apr 19, 2019

Previously we assume the fields 'artifact_type' and 'artifact' always
exist. This change ensures we guard against the case when one or both of
these required fields aren't present. In those cases, referencing the missing field in the parse JSON map will result in a nil-pointer dereference error.

/assign @IronPan


This change is Reviewable

not match expected format.

Previously we assume the fields 'artifact_type' and 'artifact' always
exist. This change ensures we guard against the case when one or both of
these required fields aren't present.
Copy link
Member

@IronPan IronPan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: IronPan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: IronPan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fbb9824 into kubeflow:master Apr 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants