Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a sample for explicitly defining the execution order #1668

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 3, 2019

Conversation

SinaChavoshi
Copy link
Contributor

@SinaChavoshi SinaChavoshi commented Jul 25, 2019

This sample is to address #665


This change is Reviewable

Copy link

@numerology numerology left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after resolving Alexey's comments.

@Ark-kun Ark-kun self-assigned this Aug 1, 2019
@SinaChavoshi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@Ark-kun
Copy link
Contributor

Ark-kun commented Aug 3, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ark-kun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9d6956c into kubeflow:master Aug 3, 2019
@SinaChavoshi SinaChavoshi deleted the execution_order-sample branch August 5, 2019 16:11
magdalenakuhn17 pushed a commit to magdalenakuhn17/pipelines that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
…w#1668)

* update to retry to apply resources

* retry installation due to TLS certificates ..

* update with comment and increas retry
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants