Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Getting exception from deleteNamespacedStatefulSet() call #86

Closed
chlung opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 50 comments · Fixed by #902 or #1445
Closed

Getting exception from deleteNamespacedStatefulSet() call #86

chlung opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 50 comments · Fixed by #902 or #1445
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@chlung
Copy link

chlung commented Oct 4, 2017

Hi,

I was getting exception when I issued deleteNamespacedStatefulSet() call. The call did delete statefulset, but it throw the exception back to caller.

Exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line 1 column 2004 path $.status

Here is my code,
V1DeleteOptions deleteOptions = new V1DeleteOptions()
Boolean orphanDependents = true

apiInstance.deleteNamespacedStatefulSet(name, namespace, deleteOptions, null, 60, orphanDependents, null)

Thanks.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

I'll investigate this, I suspect that it is a problem with the Swagger/OpenAPI spec indicating the wrong code for Delete...

But we'll need to investigate to be sure.

@chlung
Copy link
Author

chlung commented Oct 8, 2017

@brendanburns thanks.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I figured out the issue here...

When you delete a StatefulSet (and probably a ReplicaSet too) it initially returns a StatefulSet object, but eventually it returns a Status object.

This means that the Swagger should be oneOf(StatefulSet, Status)

But the Kubernetes Swagger here:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/master/api/openapi-spec/swagger.json

Only has the Status object.

Thus, the generated Java code barfs when it tries to parse a StatefulSet object into a Status object.

Unfortunately go-restful when generates the swagger spec doesn't support oneOf as far as I know, thus we're going to either need to massage the swagger spec before client generation, improve go-restful's swagger generation or switch to a different way of generating swagger...

None of these are great options, and none of them will happen very quickly. So for now, I think the best you can do is catch this Exception and move on...

Sorry!

@mbohlool @lwander @lavalamp fyi

@chlung
Copy link
Author

chlung commented Oct 8, 2017

@brendandburns ok. I can handle it in my code. Thanks for debugging this issue. Should we keep this issue for tracking purpose or close it for now?

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, let's definitely keep this open.

@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

mbohlool commented Oct 12, 2017 via email

@neuromantik33
Copy link

Bug also exists when trying to delete a namespaced Job. JSON output is here

{
  "kind": "Job",
  "apiVersion": "batch/v1",
  "metadata": {
    "name": "pi-s44bw",
    "generateName": "pi-",
    "namespace": "default",
    "selfLink": "/apis/batch/v1/namespaces/default/jobs/pi-s44bw",
    "uid": "a48d258d-faea-11e7-bdc1-42010a84018c",
    "resourceVersion": "11082999",
    "creationTimestamp": "2018-01-16T18:25:34Z",
    "deletionTimestamp": "2018-01-16T18:25:55Z",
    "deletionGracePeriodSeconds": 0,
    "labels": {
      "controller-uid": "a48d258d-faea-11e7-bdc1-42010a84018c",
      "job-name": "pi-s44bw"
    },
    "finalizers": [
      "orphan"
    ]
  },
  "spec": {
    "parallelism": 1,
    "completions": 1,
    "backoffLimit": 4,
    "selector": {
      "matchLabels": {
        "controller-uid": "a48d258d-faea-11e7-bdc1-42010a84018c"
      }
    },
    "template": {
      "metadata": {
        "creationTimestamp": null,
        "labels": {
          "controller-uid": "a48d258d-faea-11e7-bdc1-42010a84018c",
          "job-name": "pi-s44bw"
        }
      },
      "spec": {
        "containers": [
          {
            "name": "perl",
            "image": "perl",
            "command": [
              "perl",
              "-Mbignum=bpi",
              "-wle",
              "print bpi(2000)"
            ],
            "resources": {},
            "terminationMessagePath": "/dev/termination-log",
            "terminationMessagePolicy": "File",
            "imagePullPolicy": "Always"
          }
        ],
        "restartPolicy": "Never",
        "terminationGracePeriodSeconds": 30,
        "dnsPolicy": "ClusterFirst",
        "securityContext": {},
        "schedulerName": "default-scheduler"
      }
    }
  },
  "status": {
    "conditions": [
      {
        "type": "Complete",
        "status": "True",
        "lastProbeTime": "2018-01-16T18:25:41Z",
        "lastTransitionTime": "2018-01-16T18:25:41Z"
      }
    ],
    "startTime": "2018-01-16T18:25:34Z",
    "completionTime": "2018-01-16T18:25:41Z",
    "succeeded": 1
  }
}

However API says status is a string...

com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line 1 column 1152 path $.status

	at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:220)
	at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:879)
	at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:844)
	at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:793)
	at io.kubernetes.client.JSON.deserialize(JSON.java:106)
	at io.kubernetes.client.ApiClient.deserialize(ApiClient.java:668)
	at io.kubernetes.client.ApiClient.handleResponse(ApiClient.java:871)
	at io.kubernetes.client.ApiClient.execute(ApiClient.java:798)
	at io.kubernetes.client.apis.BatchV1Api.deleteNamespacedJobWithHttpInfo(BatchV1Api.java:511)
	at io.kubernetes.client.apis.BatchV1Api.deleteNamespacedJob(BatchV1Api.java:491)
	at com.oscaro.kubernetes.ApiHelper._clinit__closure5$_closure7(ApiHelper.groovy:80)
	at com.oscaro.kubernetes.ApiHelper._clinit__closure5(ApiHelper.groovy:73)
	at com.oscaro.kubernetes.JobExecutorTest.it should return the expected output from the job "#ns/#prefix-*"(JobExecutorTest.groovy:53)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line 1 column 1152 path $.status
	at com.google.gson.stream.JsonReader.nextString(JsonReader.java:831)
	at com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapters$16.read(TypeAdapters.java:422)
	at com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapters$16.read(TypeAdapters.java:410)
	at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$1.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:116)
	at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:216)
	... 12 more

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, this is may apply to all object deletes, we could try to wrap if we really wanted to...

@rjeberhard
Copy link
Contributor

Since we're using the async API variants, there isn't a good way to wrap this in our code. So, depending on how far away the OpenAPI v3 fix is I'd be grateful if this was wrapped -- at least so that it doesn't gum up the logs.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

brendandburns commented Mar 19, 2018 via email

@Bas83
Copy link

Bas83 commented Apr 25, 2018

Reporting that I am also running into this issue. I guess it's pretty clear already, but here's my client debug log and stacktrace:

--> POST https://192.168.1.129:8443/api/v1/namespaces?pretty=false HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 164
Accept: application/json
User-Agent: Swagger-Codegen/1.0-SNAPSHOT/java

{"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"Namespace","metadata":{"labels":{"name":"7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946"},"name":"7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946"},"spec":{}}
--> END POST (164-byte body)
<-- HTTP/1.1 201 Created (166ms)
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:46:45 GMT
Content-Length: 404
OkHttp-Sent-Millis: 1524642405060
OkHttp-Received-Millis: 1524642405070

{"kind":"Namespace","apiVersion":"v1","metadata":{"name":"7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946","selfLink":"/api/v1/namespaces/7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946","uid":"cd231c15-485c-11e8-b607-00155d380109","resourceVersion":"101976","creationTimestamp":"2018-04-25T07:46:45Z","labels":{"name":"7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946"}},"spec":{"finalizers":["kubernetes"]},"status":{"phase":"Active"}}

<-- END HTTP (404-byte body)
--> DELETE https://192.168.1.129:8443/api/v1/namespaces/7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946?pretty=false HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 75
Accept: application/json
User-Agent: Swagger-Codegen/1.0-SNAPSHOT/java

{"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"DeleteOptions","propagationPolicy":"Background"}
--> END DELETE (75-byte body)
<-- HTTP/1.1 200 OK (9ms)
Content-Type: application/json
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:46:46 GMT
Content-Length: 452
OkHttp-Sent-Millis: 1524642405314
OkHttp-Received-Millis: 1524642405321

{"kind":"Namespace","apiVersion":"v1","metadata":{"name":"7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946","selfLink":"/api/v1/namespaces/7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946","uid":"cd231c15-485c-11e8-b607-00155d380109","resourceVersion":"101981","creationTimestamp":"2018-04-25T07:46:45Z","deletionTimestamp":"2018-04-25T07:46:46Z","labels":{"name":"7700e076-b66f-4715-a716-d67764ffc946"}},"spec":{"finalizers":["kubernetes"]},"status":{"phase":"Terminating"}}

<-- END HTTP (452-byte body)
15:46:45.331 [http-nio-auto-1-exec-4] ERROR o.a.c.c.C.[.[.[.[dispatcherServlet] - Servlet.service() for servlet [dispatcherServlet] in context with path [] threw exception [Request processing failed; nested exception is com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line 1 column 429 path $.status] with root cause
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line 1 column 429 path $.status
at com.google.gson.stream.JsonReader.nextString(JsonReader.java:825)
at com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapters$16.read(TypeAdapters.java:401)
at com.google.gson.internal.bind.TypeAdapters$16.read(TypeAdapters.java:389)
at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$1.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:129)
at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:220)
at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:888)
at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:853)
at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:802)
at io.kubernetes.client.JSON.deserialize(JSON.java:110)
at io.kubernetes.client.ApiClient.deserialize(ApiClient.java:668)
at io.kubernetes.client.ApiClient.handleResponse(ApiClient.java:871)
at io.kubernetes.client.ApiClient.execute(ApiClient.java:798)
at io.kubernetes.client.apis.CoreV1Api.deleteNamespaceWithHttpInfo(CoreV1Api.java:12133)
at io.kubernetes.client.apis.CoreV1Api.deleteNamespace(CoreV1Api.java:12114)

@Bas83
Copy link

Bas83 commented Apr 25, 2018

So is this something that the Kubernetes server team will fix when improving Swagger documentation generation, or something you will (eventually) fix by using a different generator?

Just some example deal-with-it code here for future readers. It's not pretty but meh:

        try {
            api.deleteNamespace(namespaceString, deleteOptions, PRETTY_PRINT, null, null, null);
            LOGGER.debug("Deleted namespace {}", namespaceString);
        }
        catch (JsonSyntaxException e) {
            if (e.getCause() instanceof IllegalStateException) {
                IllegalStateException ise = (IllegalStateException) e.getCause();
                if (ise.getMessage() != null && ise.getMessage().contains("Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT"))
                    LOGGER.debug("Catching exception because of issue https://github.com/kubernetes-client/java/issues/86", e);
                else throw e;
            }
            else throw e;
        }

@rumstead
Copy link

+1

@patricklucas
Copy link

This issue is getting dangerously close to its first birthday—have there been any developments that might lead to a fix? Or at least an "official" recommendation for a workaround.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

@patricklucas unfortunately, there is really very little that we can do here. Until OpenAPI supports multi-type return (or inheritance) the generated client is always going to only be able to return one Java type, while the actual Kubernetes API server will always return two different types, resulting in this exception.

The only 'workaround' is to catch the exception and move on. It's difficult to turn that into a utility method, since it could be any delete call (we'd have to code-generate the exception-catching code)

I'm open to suggestions to improve this behavior, but I have a hard time figuring out the right way to address the issue, without fixing the root cause, which is currently blocked on moving to OpenAPI 3 (kubernetes/kubernetes#51163) and having a codegen that supports OpenAPI 3 (swagger-api/swagger-codegen#6598)

If you have suggestions for temporary workarounds until then, please feel free to add them to the issue, I'm happy to implement them.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Mar 20, 2020
@desember
Copy link

desember commented Mar 23, 2020

@brendanburns can you add CRUD operations to the Examples, please? It can spare a lot of time and frustration 😃. Thanks.

@yue9944882
Copy link
Member

A workaround for this issue will be using GenericKubernetesApi. plz refer to the example by #902

@PhaniKumar
Copy link

@brendanburns is this also related to the same issue?
I am getting exception when trying to replace PVC (existing PVC is not updated).
The same yaml is used to create the PVC.

Yaml.addModelMap("v1", "PersistentVolumeClaim", V1PersistentVolumeClaim.class);
V1PersistentVolumeClaim v1ClaimYaml = (V1PersistentVolumeClaim)Yaml.load(reader);
log.debug("toString-v1ClaimYaml[{}]", v1ClaimYaml.toString());
V1PersistentVolumeClaim v1Claim = api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim(claimName, K8Config.getNamespace(), v1ClaimYaml, null, null, null);
toString-v1ClaimYaml[class V1PersistentVolumeClaim {
    apiVersion: v1
    kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
    metadata: class V1ObjectMeta {
        annotations: null
        clusterName: null
        creationTimestamp: null
        deletionGracePeriodSeconds: null
        deletionTimestamp: null
        finalizers: null
        generateName: null
        generation: null
        initializers: null
        labels: null
        managedFields: null
        name: test-pvc
        namespace: null
        ownerReferences: null
        resourceVersion: null
        selfLink: null
        uid: null
    }
    spec: class V1PersistentVolumeClaimSpec {
        accessModes: [ReadWriteOnce]
        dataSource: null
        resources: class V1ResourceRequirements {
            limits: null
            requests: {storage=Quantity{number=1073741824, format=BINARY_SI}}
        }
        selector: null
        storageClassName: default
        volumeMode: null
        volumeName: null
    }
    status: null
}]
Unable to update PersistentVolumeClaim[test-pvc] Exception[Unprocessable Entity]
io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiException: Unprocessable Entity
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiClient.handleResponse(ApiClient.java:979)
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiClient.execute(ApiClient.java:895)
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.apis.CoreV1Api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaimWithHttpInfo(CoreV1Api.java:28959)
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.apis.CoreV1Api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim(CoreV1Api.java:28933)
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
  name: test-pvc
spec:
  accessModes:
  - ReadWriteOnce
  storageClassName: default
  resources:
    requests:
      storage: 1Gi

@ZP-AlwaysWin
Copy link

@brendanburns is this also related to the same issue?
I am getting exception when trying to replace PVC (existing PVC is not updated).
The same yaml is used to create the PVC.

Yaml.addModelMap("v1", "PersistentVolumeClaim", V1PersistentVolumeClaim.class);
V1PersistentVolumeClaim v1ClaimYaml = (V1PersistentVolumeClaim)Yaml.load(reader);
log.debug("toString-v1ClaimYaml[{}]", v1ClaimYaml.toString());
V1PersistentVolumeClaim v1Claim = api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim(claimName, K8Config.getNamespace(), v1ClaimYaml, null, null, null);
toString-v1ClaimYaml[class V1PersistentVolumeClaim {
    apiVersion: v1
    kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
    metadata: class V1ObjectMeta {
        annotations: null
        clusterName: null
        creationTimestamp: null
        deletionGracePeriodSeconds: null
        deletionTimestamp: null
        finalizers: null
        generateName: null
        generation: null
        initializers: null
        labels: null
        managedFields: null
        name: test-pvc
        namespace: null
        ownerReferences: null
        resourceVersion: null
        selfLink: null
        uid: null
    }
    spec: class V1PersistentVolumeClaimSpec {
        accessModes: [ReadWriteOnce]
        dataSource: null
        resources: class V1ResourceRequirements {
            limits: null
            requests: {storage=Quantity{number=1073741824, format=BINARY_SI}}
        }
        selector: null
        storageClassName: default
        volumeMode: null
        volumeName: null
    }
    status: null
}]
Unable to update PersistentVolumeClaim[test-pvc] Exception[Unprocessable Entity]
io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiException: Unprocessable Entity
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiClient.handleResponse(ApiClient.java:979)
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiClient.execute(ApiClient.java:895)
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.apis.CoreV1Api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaimWithHttpInfo(CoreV1Api.java:28959)
        at io.kubernetes.client.openapi.apis.CoreV1Api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim(CoreV1Api.java:28933)
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
  name: test-pvc
spec:
  accessModes:
  - ReadWriteOnce
  storageClassName: default
  resources:
    requests:
      storage: 1Gi

You can write like this, you can see the detailed error information

try {
    Yaml.addModelMap("v1", "PersistentVolumeClaim", V1PersistentVolumeClaim.class);
    V1PersistentVolumeClaim v1ClaimYaml = (V1PersistentVolumeClaim)Yaml.load(reader);
    log.debug("toString-v1ClaimYaml[{}]", v1ClaimYaml.toString());
    V1PersistentVolumeClaim v1Claim = api.replaceNamespacedPersistentVolumeClaim(claimName, K8Config.getNamespace(), v1ClaimYaml, null, null, null);
} catch (ApiException e) {
            log.debug(e.getResponseBody());
            e.printStackTrace();
}

@parth-thakkar
Copy link

Guys,
any updates on this issue, i am getting error on deleting the pod.

api.deleteNamespacedPod(pod.getMetadata().getName(), "default", body, null, null, 30, null, null);

The exception is as below,

com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line 1 column 2285 path $.status
        at com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:224)

@markusheiden
Copy link

markusheiden commented Jul 25, 2020

I debugged into this using GCP Kubernetes v1.16.8-gke.15. It seems that the "status" of the "V1Pod" response in the "deleteNamespacedPod" case is parsed as "V1Status" (as implemented in "deleteNamespacedPodWithHttpInfo") instead of "V1PodStatus" as defined in "V1Pod" which obviously fails.

Anyway it looks like the actual response "V1Pod" does not match the expected response "V1Status" in the client.

IMO this is a severe error in the client which should at least be documented. Since this is known for over two year now...

A possible workaround is (iff your Kubernetes cluster is ALWAYS returning V1Pod instead of V1Status) to reimplement some of the client's convenience methods with the "correct" type, e.g. like this:

private V1Pod deleteNamespacedPod(String name, String namespace, String pretty, String dryRun, Integer gracePeriodSeconds, Boolean orphanDependents, String propagationPolicy, V1DeleteOptions body) throws ApiException {
    var core = new CoreV1Api(client);
    var call = core.deleteNamespacedPodCall(name, namespace, pretty, dryRun, gracePeriodSeconds, orphanDependents, propagationPolicy, body, null);
    return client.<V1Pod>execute(call, (new TypeToken<V1Pod>() {}).getType()).getData();
}

Please note that this implementation is not 100% equivalent to the original "deleteNamespacedPod" method as it is missing some of its validation.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

@markusheiden Kubernetes returns both V1Status and the specific object depending on if the delete finished in time.

Delete is a semi-asynchronous operation and what is returned depends on the time the operation takes. You can't rely on it always returning a V1Pod it will sometimes return V1Status depending on how long the delete takes.

Unfortunately, the Kubernetes Swagger spec here only specifies one of the types (V1Status) so that's what gets generated in this client.

@markusheiden
Copy link

markusheiden commented Jul 26, 2020

@brendandburns Thanks for the details.

A possible workaround is to reimplement some of the client's convenience methods with auto detecting the type, e.g. like this:

private Object deleteNamespacedPod(String name, String namespace, String pretty, String dryRun, Integer gracePeriodSeconds, Boolean orphanDependents, String propagationPolicy, V1DeleteOptions body) throws ApiException, IOException {
    var core = new CoreV1Api(client);
    var call = core.deleteNamespacedPodCall(name, namespace, pretty, dryRun, gracePeriodSeconds, orphanDependents, propagationPolicy, body, null);
    var response = call.execute();
    try {
        return client.handleResponse(response, (new TypeToken<V1Pod>() {}).getType());
    } catch (JsonSyntaxException e) {
        return client.handleResponse(response, (new TypeToken<V1Status>() {}).getType());
    }
}

Please note that this implementation is not 100% equivalent to the original "deleteNamespacedPod" method as it is missing some of its validation.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 4, 2020

Hi, is this issue resoved? or is there any way to avoid this error?

mrMoZ1 pushed a commit to vmware/versatile-data-kit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2021
Why: During testing of the new feature - cancelling a running or submitted
data job execution I stumbled upon an error in the K8S api. A sucessfull
call would throw a JsonSyntaxException. This is a known issue on the K8S
API - kubernetes-client/java#86 . We already handle
this in other methods.

What: Mimicked the way we handle this exception in our codebase and
modified the cancelRunningCronJob method to handle JsonSyntaxExceptions.

Type: Bug fix.

Testing: ci/cd and ran tests concerning Execution cancellation locally.

Signed-off-by: mrMoZ1 <mzhivkov@vmware.com>
mrMoZ1 pushed a commit to vmware/versatile-data-kit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2021
)

Why: During testing of the new feature - cancelling a running or submitted
data job execution I stumbled upon an error in the K8S api. A sucessfull
call would throw a JsonSyntaxException. This is a known issue on the K8S
API - kubernetes-client/java#86 . We already handle
this in other methods.

What: Mimicked the way we handle this exception in our codebase and
modified the cancelRunningCronJob method to handle JsonSyntaxExceptions.

Type: Bug fix.

Testing: ci/cd and ran tests concerning Execution cancellation locally.

Signed-off-by: mrMoZ1 <mzhivkov@vmware.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet