Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using in production #239

Closed
tamalsaha opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 7 comments
Closed

Using in production #239

tamalsaha opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 7 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@tamalsaha
Copy link

Hello,
Is there any plans to make this a production quality driver? Or, this will remain as a non-production driver?

Thanks.

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor

pohly commented Jan 28, 2021

Is there any plans to make this a production quality driver?

No.

Is there a need for it? What would be the advantage over the in-tree emptydir or hostpath volume types?

I guess it could be used to manage additional disks, but that raises all kinds of questions that don't have good answers (IMHO).

@tamalsaha
Copy link
Author

tamalsaha commented Jan 28, 2021

We want to use local volume for running databases. We have been using https://github.com/rancher/local-path-provisioner . But a CSI driver will be nice, since that is the future.

@aglitke
Copy link

aglitke commented Mar 3, 2021

I would also like to point this thread to https://github.com/kubevirt/hostpath-provisioner This driver sees significant usage and combined with @tamalsaha 's previous comment I think there is a case for a multi-node, production-grade driver. It would be nice if we could all work together on a single one instead of fragmenting. Hostpath is preferred over local-volume for several reasons including the possibility of dynamic provisioning. A CSI driver is superior because it is not deprecated technology and because CSI allows for snapshots and cloning.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 1, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 1, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants