-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add eks fargate antiaffinity to controller (same as is in node) #375
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wongma7 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@wongma7: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
new one : • Failure [1005.175 seconds] |
I'm a little confused, does this mean that the installation of EFS CSI Helm chart is totally not supported on a Fargate only cluster? I'm attempting to install it but it's failing due to security context requiring priviledged field. |
@aldojimenez it's not supported. We have not tested it. I don't know if it will ever be supported, that is a question for EKS/fargate. The controller will not run on fargate nodes because it requires metadata service. The node will not run either, but EKS on fargate has their own solution for that: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/containers/running-stateful-workloads-with-amazon-eks-on-aws-fargate-using-amazon-efs/ |
@wongma7: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it? otherwise, the controller could get scheduled to a fargate node where it won't be able to function full y.
I'm going to hold off b umping the helm chart for now, trying to squeeze sidecar image updates in today as well
What testing is done?