Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Import boskos subdirectory from kubernetes/test-infra #1

Merged

Conversation

ixdy
Copy link
Contributor

@ixdy ixdy commented May 14, 2020

The boskos directory was filtered by running the following command
inside kubernetes/test-infra:

git-filter-repo --subdirectory-filter boskos

The only merge conflicts were the OWNERS and README.md at top-level:

  • The existing OWNERS from kubernetes-sigs/boskos was used, rather than
    the one imported from kubernetes/test-infra.
  • I added the Community discussion and code of conduct sections from
    the template to the imported README.md.

I added one small commit to update the README.md to point to the right Slack channel and mailing list, but I haven't made any other changes yet; notably, this will fail to build.

/assign @alvaroaleman @stevekuznetsov

k8s-ci-robot and others added 30 commits August 21, 2019 17:46
Delete SSL cert after target proxy to avoid in-use-by error
Updating Boskos to hold the lock when config is being synced
Delete vendor from test-infra
The sample defined a function that recursively called itself without
ever doing anything else.
When the boskosctl command fails to send one heartbeat, it is not a
catastrophic error as we send heartbeats much more frequently than
strictly necessary to retain our lease. This allows us to keep an error
budget and exit only when exceeding it, which is valuable as transitive
network issues should not crash the heartbeat command.

Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Update prow to v20190911-0708557a1, and other images as necessary.
Revert listed Boskos version(s) to deployed images
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
Move cleaner back to an example
Kubernetes Prow Robot and others added 12 commits May 4, 2020 20:09
Update prow to v20200501-dc40536ba, and other images as necessary.
Update prow to v20200507-36c6a27f0, and other images as necessary.
Update prow to v20200508-b3e98e45b, and other images as necessary.
Update prow to v20200511-c16c836df, and other images as necessary.
The boskos directory was filtered by running the following command
inside kubernetes/test-infra:

`git-filter-repo --subdirectory-filter boskos`

The only merge conflicts were the OWNERS and README.md at top-level:
- The existing OWNERS from kubernetes-sigs/boskos was used, rather than
  the one imported from kubernetes/test-infra.
- I added the Community discussion and code of conduct sections from
  the template to the imported README.md.
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ixdy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 14, 2020
@ixdy ixdy force-pushed the merge-kubernetes-test-infra-boskos branch from 3228ba1 to 122b840 Compare May 14, 2020 23:59
@ixdy ixdy mentioned this pull request May 15, 2020
@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 15, 2020
@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

Why does it not merge 🤔

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit e729d5f into kubernetes-sigs:master May 15, 2020
@ixdy ixdy mentioned this pull request May 15, 2020
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet