Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CoreDNS Operator: Smoke Tests #36

Closed
johnsonj opened this issue Dec 2, 2019 · 13 comments
Closed

CoreDNS Operator: Smoke Tests #36

johnsonj opened this issue Dec 2, 2019 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@johnsonj
Copy link
Contributor

johnsonj commented Dec 2, 2019

Create an end-to-end smoketest for coredns-operator. The test should run locally by default (via kind or kinder) and support running on a remote kubernetes cluster when provided.

The test should implement and validate the following scenarios:

  • Creation 
  • Deletion
  • Configuration Change
  • Upgrade the version of CoreDNS
  • Downgrade the version of CoreDNS

This work will require adding multiple versions to the CoreDNS version directory.

Implementation Nodes:

  • The test can be based off the existing dashboard-operator smoketest [src].
  • If there is bandwidth, write a test framework in kubebuilder-declarative-pattern and consume it in the coredns-operator repo. 
    • Roughly: A test framework would perform the execution of the test (eg, install the operator, CRDs), provide a set of common validation functions (eg verifyNoWorkloadsWithLabel) and allow the operator author to pass in their own “AddonTest” object.
    • The kubebuilder/controller-runtime folks may be providing something like this (/cc @ecordell)

/cc @annp1987

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 1, 2020
@johnsonj
Copy link
Contributor Author

johnsonj commented Mar 2, 2020 via email

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 2, 2020
@vanou
Copy link

vanou commented Mar 31, 2020

After I finish this issue, I'll tackle this.

/assign

@somtochiama
Copy link
Member

Heyy @vanou, Care to release one issue?

@vanou
Copy link

vanou commented Apr 2, 2020

Sorry. Currently I’m working on #65. So, currently, I unassign me from this.

/unassign

@vanou vanou removed their assignment Apr 4, 2020
@somtochiama
Copy link
Member

/assign

@johnsonj I wanted to start working on the test framework first in kubebuilder-pattern, wdyt?

@johnsonj
Copy link
Contributor Author

johnsonj commented Apr 6, 2020

SGTM @somtochiama !

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 5, 2020
@vanou
Copy link

vanou commented Jul 8, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 8, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 6, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 5, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants