-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix EKS encryption config value comparisons #3040
Fix EKS encryption config value comparisons #3040
Conversation
Hi @jon-fearer. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
cb71646
to
3b72793
Compare
3b72793
to
cb26b1b
Compare
cb26b1b
to
0378eb8
Compare
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sedefsavas The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…n-config Fix EKS encryption config value comparisons
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR addresses a couple of issues that are preventing EKS-managed clusters from fully reconciling when encryption is enabled:
g.Expect(...)
vsg.Expect(...).To(...)
)Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #2908
Special notes for your reviewer:
This PR does not address the refactor work here, but I am happy to add that if it's still wanted.
Checklist:
Release note: