Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃摉 ClusterClass proposal: remove builtin labels & annotations variables, add new #5619

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Nov 9, 2021

Signed-off-by: Stefan B眉ringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
For now we won't implement builtin labels/annotations variables. So let's update the ClusterClass proposal to reflect that to avoid confusing users.

Depending on the outcome of the discussion #5577 we can potentially introduce the labels/annotations variables later and add them to the proposal again.

This PR also syncs the other labels with the latest results from #5534.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 9, 2021
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title 馃摉 ClusterClass: remove builtin labels & annotations variables 馃摉 ClusterClass proposal: remove builtin labels & annotations variables Nov 9, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 9, 2021
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-drop-builtin-labels-annotations branch from 634c870 to fa64e79 Compare November 9, 2021 17:35
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title 馃摉 ClusterClass proposal: remove builtin labels & annotations variables 馃摉 ClusterClass proposal: remove builtin labels & annotations variables, add new Nov 9, 2021
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
Also commented on #5577

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Nov 9, 2021
Signed-off-by: Stefan B眉ringer buringerst@vmware.com
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-drop-builtin-labels-annotations branch from fa64e79 to c4609d2 Compare November 10, 2021 07:24
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Nov 10, 2021
@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Nov 10, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 10, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 0092df1 into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 10, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.1 milestone Nov 10, 2021
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-cc-drop-builtin-labels-annotations branch November 10, 2021 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants